Note: The following sections in this chapter are intentionally left blank: AD-4.4, AD-4.5, AD-4.6, AD-4.7, AD-4.8, AD-4.10, AD-4.11, AD-4.13, AD-4.14, AD-4.15, AD-4.16, AD-4.17, AD-4.18, AD-4.19, AD-4.20, AD-4.21, AD-4.22 and AD-4.24.
LP78 — Alentejo Air Park
1 | Ultralight runway reference point and site | LAT: 372756N LONG: 0084414W |
2 | Direction and distance of ultralight runway reference point from centre of the town that it serves | 5,5 Km SSW from S.Teotónio. |
3 | Ultralight runway elevation and reference temperature | 129 M (422 FT) / NOT AVBL |
4 | Geoid undulation at the ultralight runway elevation position | NOT AVBL |
5 | MAG VAR (date) and annual change | 04° W (2013) / 0.13° decreasing |
6 | Ultralight runway operator, address, telephone, fax, email address and AFS | Urb. Cerca das Árvores, 197645-246 VILA NOVA DE MILFONTESPhone: +351 963 955 409Email: [email protected] |
7 | Types of traffic permitted (IFR/VFR) | VFR |
8 | Remarks | Ultralight aircraft Private runway |
1 | Ultralight runway operator | HJ |
2 | Remarks | Subject to 24 HR PPR with written formal authorization from the responsible person. |
1 | Use of aircraft stand Identification signs, taxiway guide lines and visual docking/parking guidance system at aircraft stands | NIL |
2 | Runway and taxiway markings and lights | NIL |
3 | Stop bars | NIL |
4 | Remarks | WDI not lighted |
Designation | TRUE BRG | Dimensions of RWY (M) | Strength (PCN) and surface of RWY and SWY | THR coordinates / RWY End coordinates / THR Geoid Undulation | THR elevation and highest elevation of TDZ of precision APCH RWY | Slope of RWY/SWY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
08 | NOT AVBL | 395x20 | Compacted soil | 372753.45N0084425.35W | 117 M / 385 FT | +2.8% |
26 | NOT AVBL | 372757.02N0084409.90W | 129 M / 422 FT | -2.8% |
Designation | SWY dimensions (M) | CWY dimensions (M) | Strip dimensions (M) | OFZ | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 14 |
08 | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL |
26 |
Pilots must verify the compatibility of the respective aircraft performance with the runway slope (±2.8%) and with the high temperatures that can be experienced on site.